HyperFlight
    If we cannot create and direct gravitational force we are but a stepping stone

Gravitation manifests as force acting among each and every atom. Standing in the accelerating rocket, the force acts only on our feet and the force from the rocket's acceleration is not the same as the force of gravitation.

Inflated beach ball squishes and deforms under acceleration in the rocket ship but the ball becomes nice and round when the ship stops accelerating -- even if the ball continues to be attracted and accelerated by the earth's gravitation. Acceleration cannot be equated with gravitation.

 
 Hyperstates: Link to Pythagoreans ®
All is number

Daaad...

    Yes, Virginia.

When the parachutist is free-falling, his speed gets faster and faster but there is nothing pushing down on his back.

    I think you've got it. Now tell me: 'In the rocket you get pushed into your seat but would a person get hurt if speeding up in gravity of ten, hundred times as much?'

He would not — but then, if there is nothing pushing on the person, why cannot he just go up?


Gravitational force is an extension of the atomic organization. Pursuing force to the macro leads to the Pythagorean Tetractys and organization under the constructs of degrees of freedom. Pursuing force to the micro leads to the Hunab Ku under the constructs of spin and symmetries. Pursuing movement and placement leads to numbers. Pursuing numbers leads to the truth.

The book you will thoroughly enjoy
QUANTUM PYTHAGOREANS
 To Publisher... More ..
After sloshing through noise all day, reconnect with the fundamentals

 

MSN Search

Site search works well for keywords that cut across several pages such as 'golden ratio' or 'create photon' or 'circle' or 'Pi' or 'virtual energy'

Categories on this page with selected topics:

Current topics:

"Virtual numbers are imaginary numbers. Curious, but that's about it."

    -- Not so fast. Virtual numbers come from the square root of minus one. They are curious because they've been around for a thousand years at least but nobody could make much with them or of them. This month we bring the virtual and the irrational numbers together to see how they play. You might guess this month's DSSP topic is about the physics of a photon and you would be right. But the virtual numbers also make a domain of their own.

     

"Pentacle is for witches."

    -- Yes, it is. There are also guys who get really self-righteous speaking of evil pentacles. They foam at the mouth and speak of the end of the world so much you'd think they'll sprout horns any minute now. So, February DSSP topic is about creation of a pentagram from a brand new pentacle -- and it is about the workings of a gas molecule. Don't expect the antichrist predictors to calm down, though. Anybody speaking about dogma cannot calm down simply because they don't know any better. Smile and keep on creating.

     

"I love frequencies. Some can even be mysterious."

    -- Before you get excited by frequencies you want to know something about such a complex topic. In our December DSSP topic we put some structure into it and sum up the multitude of frequency sources. Happy New Year ..

    -- You will need multiple frequencies if you want to create something from nothing. Well, the nothing is nothing in the material sense and you'll have to put it together logically first. In our first 2010 DSSP topic.

     

"Electron is like a little bouncing ball. A very little bouncing ball."

    -- But an electron can also become a wave. Okay, you knew that but does the electron physically spread and then reduce again? Yep, nothing's forbidden about that and in our September, October and November '09 topics we ask you to apply it in the most unusual place -- your body.

     

"Photon is like a little bouncing ball. A very little bouncing ball."

    -- Did you really pay money for the photon-bouncing-ball nonsense? That's fine by me if you like to work hard and fool yourself. But if you like a proven experiment to take you straight to the fundamentals then in our August '09 topic you will find your time well spent.

     

"Future time is not linear? Yeah, warp on."

    -- You want to foretell the future. It is about the infinity of variables doing their thing. Yes, it can be managed. In our July '09 topic.

     

"I don't believe anything posted on April 1."

    -- Maybe we don't want you to believe what the Sphinx is about.

     

"Ha, but you cannot prove what's straight and what curves!"

    -- But of course you can. The straight path and the curved path are about two forms of geometries that can be proven to be distinct and valid in their own right. The path is either straight or curved and you will know the difference through the 'squaring of the circle' topic.

     

"Tarot is so old it cannot possibly be right."

    -- The age of reason has been around for a while but what makes this world go 'round is not necessarily straightforward. This month's topic clues you in on Tarot and links you to something even older.

     

"Synaptic gap functioning is not quantum mechanical because the gap is too wide."

    -- Scientists know very little about the brain. Okay, we could say they don't know how to use it, but that's not good enough. We just tell them how it works and they will not believe it -- in May DSSP topic.

     

Rational numbers are but an outcome of the very ancient concept of rationing

    -- You have to ratio things to understand more about your environment, and it all came to a head with Leibniz and Newton. These two guys generalized rationing all right but did they really come up with something new? In our March DSSP topic we bring in more players.

     

"The point is .. well, I mean, what's really the point in geometry -- besides being something very small."

    -- We start with a point and move on to a line. But then we also derive the difference between the two and arrive at the absolute shortest length (ASL). A nice way to kick off the summer. In our June '07 DSSP topic.

    -- If we delete a point from an area of a circle, the area of the circle 1) will change or 2) will not change. If energy is proportional to an area, can we split the area exactly in half? In our July '07 DSSP topic we look at the exact split of a wavefunction with geometry.

    -- The zero-dimensional point is the fourth domension. The 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D were and are the quad and the tetra of geometry. In Deccember '07 DSSP topic we talk about the 0D point and why the point is the fourth dimension. Time is always a dependent variable and time always follows.

     

Exclusion. Is exclusion the only thing guys have in common?

    Physicists look at bouncing balls and think the whole universe is about exclusion. But if you want to build something -- say helium from hydrogen -- you may want to figure out how to include new components through symmetry. Yet another milestone topic on the DSSP page.

 

Select another topic from the gold post
HyperFlight home Portal in new window

back to categories


About gravitation: You may follow the main path starting with Concept One, or pick the topics below as the spirit moves you

 

"Gravitation is about warped space. That's all I know."

    Not so. Although a warped mind produces warped theories, you will want to do better than that. Get going with pictures/slides that sum it up. Then you firm up with basic concepts that will enable you to go for a spin, and zoom up and down the scale of the universe. Not a bad start.

    If you feel up to a full dose of gravitation, invite a bunch of QM gravitation ideas and see if you can sort them all out. Think of it as the readiness test for the diamond run. If you crash, take time to pick up the pieces and try again, faster than ever.

     

Gravitation attracts

    -- And we have equations, too. So why is it we still don't understand it? If gravitation issues from computable relationships among matter's components, let's find them. We put down some of gravitation's components in our April 2008 DSSP topic.

     


About energy:

back to categories

"Circles are easy."

    -- It surely seems that way. But once you find out you cannot make a perfect circle from a real thing such as your rubber band, the circle becomes a bit more mysterious. In our September '07 DSSP topic we talk about the energy and the perfect circle -- and the stars, too.

     

The energy comes from ..

    -- Light. That's easy enough but light has one nifty property that is common to all energies. We take light apart through symmetry. There is a surprise in the December 2008 year-end topic.

    -- Something that we consume. That may be the case but we always get heat and we have to pay for it. So, is there something that would not involve the consumables and heat? What's energy, anyway? We look at energy and give it extra ingredients in the November 2008 DSSP topic.

     

"Hey, Bunky, the conservation of energy is the law and you cannot get something from nothing."

    -- Of course. Let's start slow. Let's get some gas out of water just like Yull Brown. It has interesting properties. But what if it takes less energy to create Brown's gas than to burn it back to water? In September 2008 DSSP topic we look into the future of the Brown's gas over-unity, wrapping up this three month summer topic.

    -- Of course. Then again, so what? Then again, what if the self-running magnetic motor does not run on local energy? What if the law of the conservation of energy holds and the scientists are wrong in spite of it? In June's DSSP topic. Another summer is here and it is good time to tinker -- perhaps with a theory to your back.

     

"Here you want to drill vacuum for energy"

    -- Sounds like words from the burning bush but it's been going on since around 1910. Does the energy become free energy if we can figure it out? Zero-point energy is about zero point geometry or zero-dimensional point that has unique computing character. With many starts and stops, it is a fertile area for energy conspiracies, too. Pythagoreans discovered unique properties of incommensurable (irrational) numbers and were happy if secretive about it -- let the present day mathematicians speak for themselves.

    -- You may think the golden ratio is about something other than energy -- and perhaps it is. But if you get the notion you do not want spinning generators to come up with some energy, you may give the golden proportion a look. With new attitude you may even notice the crease running up the mid face of the Great Pyramid.

     

Whatever energy is given to the particle -- stays with the particle

    -- Dual slit experiment shows nicely that the energy imparted on the particle stays with the particle and cannot be snitched by changing the frame of reference. In July's DSSP topic, the superposition of the wave reflects reality only with absolute framework

     

Continuum is cool if it holds. Transforming a continuum reversibly can just be The Prize

    -- Put energy into continuum to get it to hold, transform it to make it move. Cannot have a continuum without energy. When you exit this one you'll know there is no space-time continuum, for neither distance or time carry energy.

     

Must expend energy to get objects moving. If the frame of reference is allowed to move, however, the energy conservation is ignored and the object only appears to be moving

    -- New definition of inertia resolves this inconsistency. Relativistic postulate is good for collisions but that's about it. Oh, forget about atomic half-life if you want absolute clock -- inertia affects that, too

     

To explain the wave nature of the atom, scientists blabber about the small vs. the big particle.

    -- It's been always about the momentum -- that is moving energy -- and even a big particle can have any wavelength. In December '06 DSSP topic.

     

Destruction of matter and antimatter is a well known mechanism that releases a lot of energy.

    -- Black hole never has a chance but if you are into pseudoscience anything is possible. In November '06 DSSP topic.

     

"You can speed up any object which can give you a bump on the head in more ways than one."

    -- Moving object conserves its speed and thus its energy. Okay, but how does it really happen? What mechanism preserves the object's momentum? July DSSP topic introduces necessary components that give and keep energy with the object.

     

It is not relevant to energy, gravitation, organization, chaos, clockwork, ether, cause, purpose, or religion. What is it?

    -- Singh writes on the big bang where scientists start with the most primitive notion and then make big deal out of it. Big Bang book review is an easy read that can make the book a try if you want to have fun with pseudoscience. With this book the author lost all arguments for evolution and makes a bold new step toward devolution.

     

And then there is Reiki energy

    -- Get attuned, get empowered, get results. It works for you and your family

     


About Light:

back to categories

Can you reverse light mill rotation without magic?

    -- In your freezer, of course. Here is the original discovery followed closely by instructions. There is magic you can do with a light mill, but not in this simple rotation reversal. This cool experiment is on the 'Stump your teacher' page ..

     

"So what if your left hand and your right hand reverse in the mirror -- I can still shave all right."

    -- Maybe (try tying your tie when looking at your hands in the mirror). The symmetry is rudimental and it is also fundamental. Your camera lens has the odd symmetry about a point but in the February's DSSP topic we look at the even symmetry -- the symmetry about a line. The constructs of symmetry are based on numbers but we want to make something out of them. The even symmetry could be both pretty and forceful.

     

Photon can be stretched, repeatably reshaped and its undulations increased in count -- but the photon's energy stays the same.

    -- Photons can and do amazing things but after a shape-shifting show their energy stays the same. How do they do that -- I mean, how could a photon keep its energy the same? In our first 2008 DSSP topic.

 

"Photon bumps an electron from its orbit and that is why photons have momentum."

    -- No kidding? A single photon could then trash the whole atom, eh? There is a bit more to this (really two bits) and we take a look at two kinds of photonic interactions in our February DSSP topic.

 

"There are no dogmas in science. We explain everything."

    -- That may be what the scientist will tell you. But there are things the scientist will not touch even if his life depended on it. A taboo protects a dogma because a scientist really cannot handle the truth about light. When it comes to measuring the pressure the light beam is supposed to put on a mirror at reflection, scientists will scream bloody equations and twist their face -- but they will not do the experiment. Not only are they plain wrong about light's pressure but their precious equations have no intrinsic value either. In our August DSSP topic we leave a scientist behind.

     

"Since photons of light do not put pressure on the surface of a mirror, how could photons make their presence felt?"

    -- Photon's absorption happens in a particular context. To begin with, you will need two objects because the momentum is conserved. But once you understand the mechanism you could take steps to protect yourself from hard radiation. In September '06 DSSP topic the photon's reduction happens and does not happen.

     

"A photon can be cut in half and Compton got a prize for that."

    -- He got a prize all right but the photon cannot be cut with or without the prize. A photon can do wonders and one of them is that it can stay together no matter what prize you bestow upon the guy trying to cut a photon. We look at a branching photon in our DSSP focus.

     

NASA scientists would not direct a beam of laser light against a mirror to confirm the presence or absence of light's pressure. NASA scientists and managers found it easier to stay away from facts and forget about the pursuit of objective and real physics — they found simpleton gravitation theories enchanting and missed the truth about light. Over the years and into the present, government scientists publish the results of pretend physics from which they fund their wishful thinking

    -- Link up to Devil is in one detail editorial. Our Y2K problem is about a problem lasting 2K years: Solar sailing is wow but it does not work and never did. Our solar sailing 1999 essay brought light's inability to push sail into the open. Also, give theXperiment a click in the Foundations section -- particularly good if you are ready for a real experiment

     

Photon of light changes its path going through a prism but its wavelength does not change. That is the case from the days of Newton but what if the prism or the light source is moving?

    -- It is high time to generalize this classic experiment. Do the photons of light change their wavelength (their color) when light passes through a moving prism? After all, some physicists are calling it the blue or the red shift. So, is it the color or is it the path that changes as a result of a moving prism? Go with your instinct and save a call to your mainstream physicist.

     

What if starlight from a distant star is bent by the sun's corona and not by gravitation?

    That is indeed the case. Now, do you want to remove this monkey wrench out of scientists' heads or do you want to take advantage of the truth? We get over the shortcomings of the 1919 starlight bending measurement, revisit Newton, and take a working look at the corpuscular photon of light.

     

You just thought of a way to make a perpetual motion machine

    -- If light exerts pressure at reflection, let it do work over and over with parallel mirrors! Yeah. There is nothing simpler than that. In August '06 DSSP topic we will see where the logic fails -- and let the mirror chips fall where they may.

     

How can light slow down and then speed up just like that? How can light accelerate without any extra energy?

    -- Light is a wave and it always propagates in a medium: glass, gas, water, ether, plasma. Scientists cannot vacate ether and are hiding under a rock doing the next worst thing: denying it. Photons propagate computationally and instantly change direction or speed. Photons of light have no mass or inertia but photons have another set of characteristics the likes of instant action..

     

"If photon pushes things around then by the end of the day we have one tired photon."

    -- It is easy to give away the Nobel Prize to Compton, but there is no merit behind the prize. Just spelling 'committee' right is what's left of Nobel after this photon collission. In April's DSSP topic we look at the systemic view of light -- from photon creation to transformation and back again.

     

You can have a meatball but now you have to eat it, too

    -- Nobel started with a bang but making meatballs out of photons does not improve the Swedish cooking tradition. Compton Effect Is a Defect makes you wonder how they cooked the books

     

Part it once and move it apart, part it again and move it together

    -- Put a photon through its quantum mechanical paces and bring it back together. Newton would approve.

     

Try negative probability for size -- you may like the overall positive energy

    -- You learned that photon's energy is different coming and going. But you want to revisit the photon's wavefunction because the frequency of photon's wavefunction undulations just may be about something other than energy. That is, a photon's wavefunction shape is not the same thing as its frequency. Photon's energy is the same, coming or going

 

 


 

Totally Cosmic:

back to categories

Is it a revelation that Earth and Venus can be merged into a single body with a unique and repeatable orbit? Ditto for Neptune-Pluto? If you throw Pluto away you cannot play musical orbits. If Earth and Venus together create a pentagram, there is a way of calculating the two orbital radii that produce the pentagram?

    -- Cosmic section: New Star In The Heavens celebrates the five point star. Neptune and Pluto make a star, too – two-pointed, that is. Fibonacci keeps adding stars if the golden ratio holds

     

Want to haul things into orbit using but an elevator?

    -- Every satellite must acquire certain angular velocity in addition to elevation. NASA ignores angular momentum and claims that going straight up in a space elevator is all that is needed. Why supply angular momentum if you can pay for the clowns and hand out candy to little taxpayers? We also have an update, Space Elevator 2, with illustration. "And it all came tumbling down."

     

Why argue about ether if you can just go ahead and use it

    -- How ether got evacuated is a funny story, particularly if it is done by scientists who will never be able to go there. The thing is, light is not the only entity that uses ether for propagation. Here, have some light with ether on top! We need ether not only for philosophical discussion but for free energy and hyperflight.

     

Notes of the heavenly spheres still playing

    -- A different note of the musical octave was given to each planet during the Renaissance so the planets could play. But it is about the musical ratios of the orbits of planets and moons that's the real composition.

 

 


 

On time:

back to categories

"Time is like a father figure. It goes on and on and it is very reassuring to me."

    -- Get with it. Time is not an independent dimension and never was. Nothing subordinates itselt to time. Yes, planetary orbits are stable and time can be used to make a planet prediction but it is always other things that create time. Oh, time is recorded with all other things and is the part of the recorded history and knowledge. In our June '09 we give time a role on getting to the truth.

     

"So what a time machine looks like an antique phone booth. I like time travel."

    -- The looks of a time machine can be improved all right, but don't be surprised if it still doesn't work. In our May '05 topic we look at time travel and the memory of the universe.

     

Yikes! Time is always a derivative, always follows, and can be anything?

    -- Yes to all three. The 'anything' part includes zero. On top of that, time is never an independent variable and time never leads. What it means for time to be derived. Buddhists figured it out already: time exists by convention.

     

Can you construct the absolute clock even though time is zero during nonlocal events?

Are you ready to solve the problem of simultaneity or do you prefer to muggle?

    -- Three guys on a train solve the mystery and one theory gets thrown overboard. The train conductor and his two cohorts get to synch up absolutely in the lightning hits the train topic. The illustration there can be copied (illustration is released from copyright and is in public domain).

     

Want to manipulate time and get physically into the past? To borrow a phrase from Nick Lane, ".. the truth is rather more complicated but far more interesting." On this site the fundamentals of time are discussed but the only people who can understand it are those who know there is no such thing as black holes

    -- Get into black hole detox. Keep your mind and body straight by reading a few articles on light, summarized above. The experiment cruces -- which can be performed for forty years now -- is whether photons of light can move a mirror at reflection. Finally, begin to think about time via the concept of the leading and following variables -- time is always a derived variable and cannot be generalized in and of itself


About math is pretty

 

"The circle cannot be made into the exact square and that's the beginning and the end. Hey, it's the alpha and the omega of science."

    -- Okay. That means that 'straight' and 'curved' are not the same. Therefore, 'straight' & 'curved' are absolute parameters and are not subject to convention. Still, that's just the beginning of the squaring of the circle. Between the alpha and the omega there is the tau.

     

How many perfect stars can you make with geometry?

    There are a handful and each one can also be doubled. Five pointed stars and pyramids are included. Ah, but there are no perfect stars you could make with arithmetic. You need space to make perfect stars and atoms, too

     

So this guy walks into the bank and says: ".. ..

    Golden ratio happens when multiplication and addition are in balance, and that's a good way of showing what the golden ratio is about. We use money example to make a point about the golden ratio. But you do not want to reduce the golden numbers into just one number. We also construct the golden numbers in a way you have not seen before. Then we erect the Great Pyramid and invite you inside.

     

"If an irrational number is chopped, it becomes a real number. Let's start chopping!"

    -- That's what happn's in the comp'r. Real numbers are great but in the universe there is much more space than there are real things. So, what is so useful about "space?" In May's DSSP topic we look at irrationals. About the Yikes! and the Wows!

     

"The Geometric Mean construction is well known and it's ancient -- I mean it's ancient Greek stuff."

    -- That is so but what can the Geometric Mean do? Tricks the present computer cannot. Perhaps you might fall in love with geometry. In April '07 DSSP topics we challenge you to compute with infinite irrationals.

     

"Geometric computing? What's that?"

    -- It is not a laser show. It is not fancy graphics. If you ever wondered why irrationals have an infinite mantissa and why the computer cannot deal with that -- well, then it is time to use geometric structures for computing. It is just plain existential, that's all. In our October '07 DSSP topic we give geometric computing a light touch.

     

"And in the end the irrational number is rational."

    -- Not really. Math guys love to ignore intractability. They call for the infinity of steps to make a proof even though they could never get to the end of the proof. In spite of mathematicians' pronouncements, irrational numbers are not rational, never were, and never will be. In the October's DSSP topic we look at irrationals from the arithmetic and geometric point of view.

     

 


Pictures

from Boston:
One if by land.. (54k)
Charles River (57k)

from Chicago:
Picasso at Dailey Center (184k)
Rosette at Thompson Building (188k)
Outside Thompson Building (200k)

from Rhinebeck:
Great War Soldier (393k). Possibly the most moving statue of a soldier. Needs to be placed at ground level, closer to you

from Prague:
Tycho Brahe and Kepler, (215k) One politically correct, the other not
"Secret Garden." (190k)
Apollo in Secret Garden. (190k) This picture, taken in the Secret Garden by MI in 2006, is released from copyright.
Bovine Matrix (208k). Bovine invasion 2004. Baroque Loretta in the background has real bells, though.

from Austria:
The Austrian Alps come on quickly along with lakes, islands and castles, of course. On way to Bad Ischl. Unless you are running alternate fuels it is better from the train.
Schauberger house. Shauberger legacy is about geometry and the PKS sign is bit cheezy. But neither the house or the man are going away

back to categories


Talking about us at HyperFlight:

We don't have our own blog but others are talking about us -- and here are some of the specific links to them:
(Some blogs allow you to read them without registering -- others don't.)

http://www.thesanctumsanctorum.com/board/showthread.php?t=5710
http://2012forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=15913&sid=19a8280033416c3b3a30aa19e91fa91c
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=144413
http://forum.politicainrete.net/politica-nazionale/39657-antidarwin-un-creazionista-tra-gli-scienzati-85.html (in Italian)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_biggestsecret.htm
http://10.1.250.3:15871/cgi-bin/blockOptions.cgi?ws-session=2650969005
http://www.aawforum.org/vbforum/showthread.php?t=5246
http://www.dcvonline.net/php/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7085&mode=&order=0&thold=0 (in Vietnamese)
http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=6407245&page=50
http://www.descendingashtray.com/archives/89
http://www.wikihow.com/Discussion:Draw-a-Star
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090307072333AAzvZaC (in Spanish)
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080212094513AAoHD2i
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ao_U9WTcCwWw595B.ZF_NJcjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20100131021532AAHpV9p
http://forum.builder.cz/read.php?13,3243066 (in Czech)
http://write.demandstudios.com/edit.php?articleid=1297665
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=69823

 

 E85 fuel: 85% ethanol, 15% gasoline
www.E85Fuel.com
105 Octane -- woot-woot
Possibly the last step before free energy

 

 

 

Go or select another topic from the gold post
HyperFlight home Portal in new window

HyperFlight.com site does not launch advertisement windows or add advertising frames, neither directly or through another party. We do not place or cause a placement of any tracking cookies from this web site. We have an intelligent web site counter (from StatCounter.com) that counts a plurality of page loads as a single (your) visit -- if you allow placement of cookies.

If characters are too small use View..Text Size.. on your browser

from MI:

America. If you don't like it, don't run to the Sheriff's office -- run for the Sheriff's office

There is no fast track to heaven but there is a fast track to hell

Love conquers all and it takes a lot of work

I do not wish to pay for pain just as I do not charge for giving pleasure (for Alice)

It's the economy, George!

You can have a meatball but now you have to eat it, too

® HyperStates is a Registered Trademark of Backbone Consultants Inc., 84 Myrtle Street, Boston, MA 02114. 617-723-9553
©1998 -- 2010 Backbone Consultants. Copyrights Information.

Updated monthly (at least).